-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35170/#review86946
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Config action is hot!

- Nate Cole


On June 6, 2015, 12:01 a.m., Jonathan Hurley wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/35170/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 6, 2015, 12:01 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Alejandro Fernandez and Nate Cole.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-11749
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-11749
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> After rolling upgrade from 2.2.7 -> 2.3.0 using Ambari 
> (#VERSION_NUMBER=2.1.0-1900)
> 
> oozie-site.xml does not have bunch of properties (example below)
>  <name>oozie.service.ActionService.executor.ext.classes</name>
>  <name>oozie.service.ELService.ext.functions.coord-action-create</name>
>  <name>oozie.service.ELService.ext.functions.coord-action-create-inst</name>
>  <name>oozie.service.ELService.ext.functions.coord-action-start</name>
>  
> 
> The problem here is that by the time that Falcon runs, Oozie has already 
> changed the merged 2.3 desired configuration. There were a lot of ways I 
> thought to get around this:
> 
> - Add a flag to the transfer to say whether to copy from current or desired
> - Add a conditional around a transfer
> - Just don't delete the properties
> 
> 
> At the end of the day, it seems pretty straighforward to just not delete 
> there properties in the Oozie update. If they exist, they are there for 
> Falcon and they should be preserved.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ambari-server/src/main/resources/stacks/HDP/2.2/upgrades/upgrade-2.3.xml 
> 0cee7b1 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35170/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Upgraded Oozie and Falcon; verified the properties existed and SC's passed.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jonathan Hurley
> 
>

Reply via email to