-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36587/#review92148
-----------------------------------------------------------



ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/AbstractProviderModule.java
 (line 684)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/36587/#comment146115>

    Wont it allow multiple threads to get in?


- Sumit Mohanty


On July 17, 2015, 11:45 p.m., Sid Wagle wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/36587/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 17, 2015, 11:45 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Alejandro Fernandez, Jonathan Hurley, Mahadev 
> Konar, Myroslav Papirkovskyy, and Sumit Mohanty.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-12453
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-12453
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The high level picture seems to be: Requests made from the UI for host 
> metrics trying to figure out the actual metrics service and the code that 
> updates in-memory maps which hold information of where that service is and 
> what ports to use to connect to it etc. These property maps are update by 
> Observers on important events like Cluster/Service/Host CRUD by resetting a 
> volatile variable.
> 
> The contention occurs due the thread that actually enters the monitor 
> protecting the volatile var and asks for another lock on the cluster which is 
> held by some other thread which also needs a value from the in-memory maps 
> and waits on the object monitor that it cannot enter.
> 
> Note: Web based deployments get away because not a lot of CRUD ops happen in 
> parallel to Reads like the use case of monitoring the Blueprint deploy as the 
> cluster is being provisioned.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/AbstractProviderModule.java
>  380a0fe 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36587/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> All unit test passed.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sid Wagle
> 
>

Reply via email to