That's correct.
Fixes for 2.1.2 need to go into trunk, branch-2.1.2, and branch-2.1.maint
Fixes for 2.1.3 need to go into trunk, and branch-2.1.maint

-Alejandro

On 9/17/15, 2:32 PM, "Yusaku Sako" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Sounds good.
>Fixes for 2.1.2 should also be committed to branch-2.1.maint, right?
>So it would be a commit to trunk, branch-2.1.maint, and branch-2.1.2?
>
>Yusaku
>
>
>
>On 9/17/15, 12:19 PM, "Richard Zang" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Hi developers and PMCs,
>>
>>I am proposing cutting a new branch branch-2.1.2 for Ambari 2.1.2 on Sep
>>17th 6pm PDT.
>>
>>After making the branch, we (i.e., development community) should only
>>accept blocker or critical bug fixes into the branch and harden it until
>>it meets a high enough quality bar.
>>If you have a bug fix, it should first be committed to trunk, and after
>>ensuring that it does not break any tests, then it should be integrated
>>to the Ambari branch-2.1.2.
>>If you have any doubts whether a fix should be committed into
>>branch-2.1.2, please email me for input at [email protected]
>>Stay tuned for updates on the release process.
>>
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Richard

Reply via email to