> On Feb. 18, 2016, 8:56 p.m., Matt wrote: > > ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/HAWQ/2.0.0/alerts.json, > > line 49 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/43748/diff/1/?file=1258737#file1258737line49> > > > > Should this be HOST? I believe it is more of a service level alert.
HAWQSEGMENT is a slave with cardinality of 1+ ... makes sense to keep it as HOST. - Jonathan ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43748/#review119774 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Feb. 18, 2016, 7:59 p.m., bhuvnesh chaudhary wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/43748/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Feb. 18, 2016, 7:59 p.m.) > > > Review request for Ambari, Alejandro Fernandez, Jaimin Jetly, jun aoki, > Jonathan Hurley, Jayush Luniya, Oleksandr Diachenko, Richard Zang, Sumit > Mohanty, and Yusaku Sako. > > > Bugs: AMBARI-15105 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-15105 > > > Repository: ambari > > > Description > ------- > > This patch introduces alerts for HAWQ components based on PORT. The below > components are covered. > - Master > - Standby > - Segment > > > Diffs > ----- > > ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/HAWQ/2.0.0/alerts.json > 3119a0c > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43748/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > yes, manual. > > > Thanks, > > bhuvnesh chaudhary > >