-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43748/#review120659
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!





ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/HAWQ/2.0.0/alerts.json (line 6)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43748/#comment182118>

    'HAWQ Segments' (plural)



ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/HAWQ/2.0.0/alerts.json (line 7)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43748/#comment182119>

    "number of inoperative HAWQ Segments" (plural) ('down HAWQ Segments' is 
fine - would be nice to use a better synonym) 
    
    "results of HAWQ Segments' process checks" (plural)


- Matt


On Feb. 24, 2016, 5:02 p.m., bhuvnesh chaudhary wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/43748/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 24, 2016, 5:02 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Alejandro Fernandez, Jaimin Jetly, jun aoki, 
> Jonathan Hurley, Jayush Luniya, Oleksandr Diachenko, Richard Zang, Sumit 
> Mohanty, and Yusaku Sako.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-15105
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-15105
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch introduces alerts for HAWQ components based on PORT. The below 
> components are covered.
> - Master
> - Standby
> - Segment
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/HAWQ/2.0.0/alerts.json 
> 3119a0c 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/HAWQ/2.0.0/package/alerts/alert_component_status.py
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> ambari-server/src/test/python/stacks/2.3/HAWQ/test_alert_component_status.py 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   ambari-web/app/views/main/dashboard/widgets.js 8a86af6 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43748/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> yes, manual.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> bhuvnesh chaudhary
> 
>

Reply via email to