+1 on this
On 6/2/16, 1:44 PM, "Swapan Shridhar" <sshrid...@hortonworks.com> wrote: >+1. Makes sense. > >Thanks. > >Regards, >Swapan. > > > > > > > > > >On 6/2/16, 1:27 PM, "Robert Levas" <rle...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > >>Alejandro, I agree. I just hope we (as a group) can manage the wiki >>page without letting it get too stale over time. >> >>+1 >> >>Rob >> >> >>On 6/2/16, 12:55 PM, "Alejandro Fernandez" <afernan...@hortonworks.com> >>wrote: >> >>>Hi committers and contributors, >>> >>>I'm sure most of you have ran into this before; whenever I submit a >>>code review I'm always curious to find out which reviewers I should >>>include that are knowledgeable in that area. >>>So I'll typically run git blame to find the last 2-3 people that worked >>>on those files, which takes time and may include reviewers no longer >>>interested in that code area or miss reviewers that are interested. >>>I want to propose a wiki where developers sign up to be reviewers for a >>>particular section, could be a feature, directory, etc. >>> >>>Thoughts? >>> >>>This allows developers to opt-in to areas of interest (even outside of >>>their current expertise), should produce better code reviews, and make >>>it easier for new contributors to find the right people. >>> >>>Thank you, >>>Alejandro Fernandez >>> >>
