Hello all, The voting process for Apache Ambari 2.5.0 RC1 has completed. The vote is in favor of releasing Apache Ambari 2.5.0 RC1.
The final votes are as follows: 5 +1 (4 PMCs, 1 Committer) 0 +0 0 -1 The following is a list of the votes: Sumit Mohanty (PMC) +1 Jayush Luniya (PMC) +1 Nate Cole (PMC) +1 Alejandro Fernandez (PMC) +1 Aravindan Vijayan (Committer) +1 I will begin the process of creating the release artifacts for Ambari-2.5.0 based on RC1. Thanks to all who participated in the voting process. -- Thanks and Regards, Aravindan Vijayan On 3/27/17, 11:18 AM, "Alejandro Fernandez" <[email protected]> wrote: >+1 for 2.5.0 RC1 > >Thanks, >Alejandro Fernandez >Apache Ambari PMC > >On 3/23/17, 2:11 PM, "Aravindan Vijayan" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Hello all, >> >>I have created an apache-ambari-2.5.0 release candidate. >> >>GIT source tag (release-2.5.0-rc1) >>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/ambari/repo?p=ambari.git;a=log;h=r >>efs/tags/release-2.5.0-rc1 >> >>Staging site: http://home.apache.org/~avijayan/apache-ambari-2.5.0-rc1/ >> >>PGP release keys (signed using 088372a9) - >>http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x088372A9&op=vindex >> >>One can look into the issues fixed in this release at >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI/fixforversion/12336060/?selec >>tedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:version-summary-panel >> >>Vote will be open for 72 hours. >>[ ] +1 approve >>[ ] +0 no opinion >>[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >>My vote: +1 >> >>FYI, the list of commits between rc0 and rc1 >>70b4ba403dd7e890d7fcc5964b1cd231ee6e98c0 AMBARI-20516 create table >>failing with HiveAccessControlException (additional patch). (ababiichuk) >>7bb1e3335d41ab7adaf0c66ae5fd8df454178cd7 Revert "AMBARI-20488 Config >>types are validated before the cluster resources are persisted" >>95d7cc2c000c350dc0e5efa5a0660098f21da547 Revert "AMBARI-20542 Fixed >>configuration type validation in case of blueprint deployments." >>50b192979eca936bdb8ea1ecb9a1bb624c28e7fc AMBARI-20542 Fixed configuration >>type validation in case of blueprint deployments. >> >>-- >>Thanks and Regards, >>Aravindan Vijayan > >
