So I'm considering we can move Mpack development to Ambari side,
I'm +1 on moving Mpack development to Ambari. We can expect more appropriate reviewers on Ambari side. Bigtop committers are not necessarily Ambari expert. Masatake Iwasaki On 2022/08/16 18:05, 吴治国 wrote:
Hi community, In my original idea, I was planning to provide Bigtop3.1.0 + Ambari2.7.5 for users at first, and keep all big changes in Ambari2.8.0, e.g. 1、Fix some security problems by upgrading Spring Framework and others 2、Frontend refactor 3、Upgrade python version etc. All these changes will take long time, which may be bad for the release cycle of Ambari itself. So I'm considering we can move Mpack development to Ambari side, and 2.8.0 is all about Bigtop stack, move other big changes to next major version(except the security problem, which absolutely need to be fixed in next release). But we need to make final decision for the things we discussed before, like, 1、Add prefix to installation path(/usr/bigtop) 2、Which repo to store the packages(with prefix in installation path)? 3、Related name(Stack name: BIGTOP, scripts: conf-select, distro-select, bigtop-select are all ok for me)? Any other things I forgot? What’s your opinion? Best Regards, Zhiguo Wu
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ambari.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ambari.apache.org
