This is great info, Nick! Thank you. :D Also excited to be talking on this 
list. ^_^



So. That XML file was created by me from a copy/paste of someone else’s file 
(Abdera’s..maybe) within the CMS. It’s likely my loverly little Windows 10 
Surface Pro 2 introduced some of that… Hoping editing from here on won’t cause 
issues…



I’ll get folks invited over here from the old AnnotatorJS.com list and we can 
get to work on deciding how to do the web site. I found this post educational:

https://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2010/10/22/evolution-of-apaches-websites/



Are there anything else we need to be ready for (besides needing SVN to push 
changes and/or using the CMS side/bookmarklet)?



The site right now—which I’d like to port over and re-brand is in GitHub at 
present:

https://github.com/openannotation/annotatorjs.org



Is there a way we could hook post-commit hooks into a git repo for that at the 
ASF?



(so many questions…sorry).



Thanks, Nick!

Benjamin



--
http://bigbluehat.com/
http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung



From: Nick Kew<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2016 6:11 AM
To: Benjamin Young<mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Annotator's almost incubating...I think ;)



On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 12:27:40 +0000
Benjamin Young <[email protected]> wrote:

> [chop - message not mine to post in public, so I'll
   just see if I can answer questions]

The dev mailinglist, where we should be discussing this,
can be seen at
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-annotator-dev/
I don't know why it's not listed on the front page: it's
probably awaiting some batch update.  I expect Humbedooh will know.

Regarding the incubator status page (404 from
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html )
creating that is a mentor job.  I just looked, someone's
created a placeholder annotator.xml, from which it should
be generated.  However, some bogus whitespace invalidates
the XML, which is probably why it hasn't appeared.  I just
fixed that, though the contents still need work (some of
them depend on project decisions, like svn vs git).

The podling website is another job.  There's a decision to be
made: use svnpubsub or apache CMS (if available - last time I
tried it was apparently in an indeterminate state).  Ideally
we should look for consensus before creating it.



--
Nick Kew

Reply via email to