I’m not on the initial committer list but as someone who has contributed to the anchoring libraries that are likely to end up in this project and who has often needed to link to related upstream bug reports from GitHub issues in Hypothesis projects, I’m in favour of this.
Kind Regards, Rob. > On 18 May 2017, at 10:19, Edward Silverton <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, 18 May 2017 at 01:43 Randall Leeds <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If infra gives the okay on this, I'm for it. >> I'll be watching the CouchDB progress on this. >> >> On Wed, May 17, 2017, 16:10 Nick Kew <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 17 May 2017 21:37:30 +0000 >>> Benjamin Young <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> -1 on your VOTE. This needs discussion first, as Richard >>> has already highlighted. >>> >>>> So. You may be spot on about the Wiki, but I'm confident it's >>>> possible for Issues. For instance: >>> >>> Some (many?) Apache projects accept issues submitted either on >>> Github or Apache. That's certainly OK, and makes life easy for >>> outsiders coming to the project through either route. Github >>> pull requests are also popular in Apache projects. But I'm >>> not sure about github-only: did John's talk suggest that? >>> >>> -- >>> Nick Kew >>> >>
