On 2017-07-26 17:56, Gerben wrote: > On 2017-07-11 02:29, Gerben wrote: >> Sure, on the wiki could work. Just to get the ball rolling, I drafted a >> possible outline with some questions: >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/wiki/Overview-(WIP) >> >> >> On 2017-07-09 02:22, Benjamin Young wrote: >>> Agreed. Let's begin working on some API design while Randall finishes >>> sorting out the build kit and importing his libraries. >>> >>> We can do that on the wiki, if that works: >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/wiki >>> >>> Cool? :) >>> > Any thoughts from your side on scope and API? (quite related, issue 7 > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/issues/7>: "Make the > purpose of this tool clear(er)") Would be nice to hear from at least > both of you (Benjamin, Randall) what you are roughly thinking of making > here. > > My (possibly wrong) impression is that everybody waits for others to > start doing something. Would it help to give ourselves some homework and > try schedule a first few milestones and progress calls? E.g. settle on > an initial scope & API outline in the next two weeks, then call to both > round that up and decide what we try implement in the two subsequent weeks? > > Gerben > > (also, perhaps better to switch to bottom-posting, if we grow a longer > thread)
Two weeks passed without response, I guess my suggestion for biweekly progress is rather hopeless. Perhaps a more likely productive approach could be to try meet up again somewhere sometime, and spend a day or two on creating a basic outline and setup?
