Looks fabulous, Randall. Thank you! Also, that branding question looks new. Which reminds me that we have a logo we should get into the site. :) ________________________________ From: Randall Leeds <rand...@apache.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2020 7:20:14 PM To: dev@annotator.incubator.apache.org <dev@annotator.incubator.apache.org> Subject: Re: Podling Annotator Report Reminder - February 2020
Here is the text that I've submitted. Please let me know if you'd like updates by replying here before midnight EST. -- ## Annotator Annotator provides annotation enabling code for browsers, servers, and humans. Annotator has been incubating since 2016-08-30. ### Three most important unfinished issues to address before graduating: 1. Grow contributions outside the PPMC. 2. Establish release cadence. 3. Improve documentation, and in particular articulate a roadmap. ### Are there any issues that the IPMC or ASF Board need to be aware of? The podling missed reporting in January due to holiday disruptions and has been slow to make its first ASF release. The release machinery is all in place as of this month, and voting for the first release candidate should begin within the week. ### How has the community developed since the last report? The PPMC has been more actively communicating and plans to open up a weekly call to more directly engage early users. ### How has the project developed since the last report? The release machinery is in place, with Apache Rat being used to verify that licenses are in order. The PPMC is resolved to release the current state of the project and generate momentum from there. ### How would you assess the podling's maturity? Please feel free to add your own commentary. - [X] Initial setup - [X] Working towards first release - [X] Community building - [ ] Nearing graduation - [ ] Other: ### Date of last release: Should begin voting within the week. ### When were the last committers or PPMC members elected? No new committers nor PPMC members have been added since the last report. ### Have your mentors been helpful and responsive? Mentors have been very helpful so far. They will be engaged around the initial release, to help ensure that everything is in order. ### Is the PPMC managing the podling's brand / trademarks? All the proper incubation disclaimers should be in the repository and on the website. The project is aware of no incidents of misuse of brand or trademark. On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 1:50 PM Benjamin Young <byo...@bigbluehat.com> wrote: > Looks like I'm going to have to let you handle this one solo... 😕 > Apologies! > > I've currently lost access to my IRC client and my attempts to setup > alternatives aren't going well. > > I trust the report is in (more!) capable hands. :) > > Thanks, Randall! > Benjamin > > > -- > > http://bigbluehat.com/ > > http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung > > ________________________________ > From: Randall Leeds <rand...@apache.org> > Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2020 3:40 PM > To: dev@annotator.incubator.apache.org <dev@annotator.incubator.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: Podling Annotator Report Reminder - February 2020 > > Also planning to do it today! Let's coordinate on IRC. > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020, 18:03 Benjamin Young <byo...@bigbluehat.com> wrote: > > > Thanks for the check-in, Nick! I'll get a report written tomorrow and > > mention the forthcoming release in the way you described. > > > > Thanks, again! > > Benjamin > > ________________________________ > > From: Nick Kew <n...@apache.org> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2020 8:00:03 PM > > To: dev@annotator.incubator.apache.org < > dev@annotator.incubator.apache.org > > > > > Subject: Re: Podling Annotator Report Reminder - February 2020 > > > > > > > > > On 31 Jan 2020, at 21:02, jmcl...@apache.org wrote: > > > > > > Dear podling, > > > > > > > > > report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks > > > before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and > > > submission (Wed, February 05). > > > > Is anyone dealing with this? We already missed last month. > > > > Regarding release hopes, the report can't wait for it. > > Rather say that we anticipate a release very soon, > > or whatever variant on that wording seems appropriate. > > The actual release will be for the next report. > > > > -- > > Nick Kew > > > > >
