DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18400>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18400 add failonerror to target ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-27 17:05 ------- What you are describing somewhat breaks the notion of dependancies as things that the target depends on for proper functioning. Perhaps adding a failonerror to antcall would make more sense. it might look something like this... <target name="report"> <antcall target="t1" failonerror="false"/> <antcall target="t2" failonerror="false"/> <!-- do report type stuff here --> </target> Personally I think dependancies should be dependancies, though being able to call a target such that it's failure is not fatal to the build might be useful to support in some form. I havn't used it, but I think the ant-contrib trycatch task might solve your problem until some action is taken on this. Try this link: http://ant-contrib.sourceforge.net/ant-contrib/manual/tasks/index.html
