DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18940>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18940 Proposal for making antcall with parameters less "bulky" [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-11 16:20 ------- 1. Its not a slight change, its a major change in how ant binds XML file to java source. Try it yourself to see. 2. if we did it, we'd be permanently boxed out from ever adding new attributes to <antcall>, which is something we do. 3. the advantage of <param> is it lets you provide extra qualifiers such as <param name="foo" location="somewhere">; there are differences between value and location, and perhaps you should look at the docs and see where they are applicable. Sorry,
