On 24 Jul 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So the question is what should B's import be relative to: > > 1) A.xml's basedir > 2) B.xml > 3) B.xml's currently ignored basedir attribute. > > I think that the consensus is 3).
I'm not sure, I'm more along the lines of (3) if B has a basedir attribute and (1) if B has none. That is that I can write an importable snippet that doesn't depend on on its own location by omitting the basedir attribute and setting it if it does. The usecase for the later is something like Centipede's cents (as I understand them) where a <taskdef> in the imported snippet needs to specify jars for the classpath - and would do so using relative paths. For easier installment of the full package, that should be relative to the imported file IMHO. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
