On Thursday 14 August 2003 06:38, Costin Manolache wrote: > Conor MacNeill wrote: > > The others are antlib/namespace/polymorph stuff. I'm wondering if we can > > get to the point where the ant optional tasks are packaged as antlibs and > > potentially not added to the root loader if their supporting libraries > > are not also available to the root loader. This would allow them to be > > taskdef'd in later in a build. > > What's the status on that ? Any decision on how to deal with the loaders ? > I'll have some time next week, I wanted to finish the classloader task - is > it still usefull ?
Most definitely. Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
