On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 02:36 am, Sean Rohead wrote: > Thanks for the replies. > > > But I'm still confused about the reluctance to embrace the original > proposal.
The original proposal does not solve your problem. It adds a property which changes to the target name currently being executed. If you put this in your lib target, for instance, you would always execute the lib target in your sub-builds. Conor --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
