> If macrodef attribute are to be implements as substitutions, what
> should be the notation? (where x is the attribute name)
>
[ ] as ${x} (look like ant properties) confusion with 'real'
properties
[ ] as $(x) to close to A
[ ] as @x I miss the brackets
[ ] as ${attribute:x} too long
[X] as @{x} ok, close to A but seeable
different
[ ] some thing else nothing in my mind to that
- a construct according to <xsl:value select="attributeName"/> seems to be
too long
- other XSLT constructs: $attribname, @attribname: I miss the brackets ...
- escape sequence for E could be: @@{x}; doubling the special character is
widely used
Jan
