On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Did you see the patch to allow regexp in the depends attribute > Stefan.
Yes. > This one on the other hand doesn't break the static dependency > checking, True. > and I think it would be useful. This I'm not sure of. I wouldn't oppose the patch, but am not convinced that it is really needed. Do you have an example that will let me throw my hands up shouting "of course, we need this!"? Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
