DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19220>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19220 Enhance the <fail> and/or <available> and <condition> tasks to abort when specified files are absent ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-14 21:34 ------- This is old and all, but I found it searching for existing RFEs containing "fail" and "condition". Is there a reason why having <fail> accept a nested <condition> would be A Bad Thing? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
