+1, it makes things very much clear
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27007>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27007
subant task fails even if failonerror="false"
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-17 17:21 ------- I really think that we are solving here the wrong problem. IMHO, the bug here is not with subant, which as a task to execute <targets> should decide what to do based on BuildException.
To me the problem here is that the core code that executes <tasks> ANY tasks, should catch any unhandle exception, e, and throw a corresponding BuildException(e) in its place.
The point is that the invariant of the execution engine should be either to finish succesfully, or to throw a BuildException, anything else is a bug in CORE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
