--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One nit, though. I don't like the name > ContainerMapper. > > MapperContainer? CompositeMapper?
Mine was called CompositeMapper. We ended up going with Peter's implementation, which was simpler and included the paradigm shift (defs). Peter's version includes the "chained" attribute so it's possible to get two (drastically) different behaviors from the same class. Under my design the two behaviors would have come from two different classes, but anyway because the chaining is possible the Mapper does not HAVE to behave as a "CompositeMapper" although that is the default. Doesn't matter to me what it's called, I just wanted to get it in there so I would have something concrete against which I could test the redirector stuff (I'm not committing those testcases b/c I don't want redirectors to be tied to 1.7). You can put the name to a vote or duke it out with Peter. ;) -Matt __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you�re looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
