Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Honestly, I'm not sure how big our gcj user base is and how many of
>>> them use <compilerarg> to pass additional arguments, the answer
>>> could very well be zero.
>>
>> This is not a problem. I'll try to implement it myself and if the
>> patch is not good for you, maybe we'll apply it only in
>> Debian.
>
> zero was my answer to the size of the user base I was talking about,
> not the chance of getting your patch into Ant 8-)
:-p
<snip/>
Is it possible to know the value of <compilerarg line="..."/> when I am
in the gcj class? If yes, how?
... reading the sources is a good thing to answer your own questions!
;-) (well I found your code very clear!)
Is it OK if in the Gcj class, I do something like:
String[] argsToTest = getJavac().getCurrentCompilerArgs();
Then I think I got to test if every String begins with -o or --main?
> If I'd put it towards the end of my TODO list it would likely never
> get implemented ;-)
I hope I'll have the time and knowledge to do it ;-)
Cheers,
--
~/.signature not found
< asuffield> a workstation is anything you can stick on somebodies desk
and con them into using
-- in #debian-devel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]