This is really more of a user question. Anyway, per
the manual, if you use nested mappers of any type the
<mapper> element will behave as a composite mapper,
which unions any child mapper elements. So the answer
is you would nest this way for a composite:
<copy ...>
<mapper>
<flattenmapper />
<mapper type="?" />
</mapper>
</copy>
and this way for a chained mapper:
<copy ...>
<mapper>
<chainedmapper>
<unpackagemapper />
<flattenmapper />
</chainedmapper>
</mapper>
</copy>
HTH,
Matt
--- Phil Weighill-Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed that Ant 1.6.x has added composite mapper
> and chained mapper
> options as implementations of the FileNameMapper.
>
> I can't see how to use these with the copy task
> since copy seems to only
> support the "mapper" nested element and the latter
> doesn't list
> "composite" and "chained" as appropriate types.
>
> Have I missed something or is this a bug with the
> Mapper.MapperType
> enumeration?
>
> Phil :n.
> --
> Phil Weighill-Smith
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Volantis Systems
>
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/goldrush
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
