--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Benson wrote:
> >On reviewing the code I am now seeing why I
> extended
> >UE; it contains a lot of code, as I'm sure you
> know,
> >for making these element substitutions work. Going
> >with the ProxyElement (PE) concept, PE would be a
> copy
> >of UE with makeObject() declared as abstract
> (probably
> >removing the UE parameter). Do we move UE's code
> and
> >have it extend PE? If not, why?
> >
> This would be quite hard I think.
That's what I was driving at....
-Matt
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
