[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Little test on IE6 and Firefox 1.0.4

<html>
<body>
And now test html:
<pre>
&lt;html style="test">
  &lt;body>
&lt;/html>
</pre>

</body>
</html>


That works for me. You have to mask the "<" character. After that the closing sign is ignored, because no opening sign was there.


Jan



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Alexey N. Solofnenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 18. Mai 2005 06:05
An: Ant Developers List
Betreff: Re: cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks ftp.html

Actually, &gt; is also not required.

- Alexey.

Steve Cohen wrote:


To be honest, I never thought about it. The previous

version of the


page used them and I just assumed they were required, and

followed the


pattern with my new examples. I didn't even assume,

actually, I just


followed the pattern unthinkingly.

But you're quite right. The &quot; are not necessary. The

&lt; and


&gt;, however, are.  The source file is an html page.

We aren't seriously suggesting formatting these emails, are we? To me, that makes no sense at all. This is a cvs-generated diff. Modifying it would be incorrect, making the diff unusable

as a patch,


which is, I guess, why these emails include them.

I will, however, remove the unnecessary &quot; marks.


-- -------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- / Alexey N. Solofnenko home: http://trelony.cjb.net/ /

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Right again. I don't, however, think we should do this. I don't think it adds anything in clarity and is rather ugly.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to