DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36235>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36235 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-22 23:05 ------- Thanks, Jeff! That's _exactly_ what I was looking for! I remember seeing that feature in Eclipse, but honestly, I hadn't used it before, so I didn't recall it as a solution. Just as I was starting to get used to NetBeans... (But I still favor Eclipse! :-) I still think that optional tasks w/out the necessary included libraries should at least be separated out into their own project, possibly individual projects. It just seems to promote better organization of the code, and the idea that they are not part of the core classes. In a project-oriented IDE like Eclipse, the "optional" project would depend upon "core", but not the other way around - making it impossible to link to "optional" code without moving it into the "core" package. This, however, is only my $0.02, and it's barely worth that now that I have a feasible way to develop from my regular IDE. This ticket can be closed if desired, but the comments from Steve and Alexey sounded like they were coming towards agreement on the idea. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
