>>Shall the antunit antlib be promoted?
[X] Yes (i.e. +1)
[] and I want to become a committer to it [ ] No
Testing tasks in an easy way should not be part of the hidden corner
;-).
>>Shall the svn antlib be promoted?
[X] Yes (i.e. +1)
[X] and I want to become a committer to it [] No
CVS* are core tasks and SVN is the follower. So we should have a
standard solution.
>>Shall the .NET antlib be promoted?
[] Yes (i.e. +1)
[] and I want to become a committer to it [ ] No
+0
Dont know the antlib and dont know .NET - but I dont want to be a
obstacle here.
But: if we start with .NET, why not C/C++, Cobol, ... Maybe it would be
better
in AntContrib?
I see two ways:
- Ant focuses on java language --> no .NET in Ant --> .NET in
Ant-Contrib
- Ant openes for other languages --> can we integrate AntContrib?
(just for strategic thoughts; license and commitership has to be
checked)
Jan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
