--- Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt Benson schreef: > > >viewcvs(svn) shows I did it 6.5 months ago... > >apparently so. Speaking of which, Kev (I think) > >mentioned these are static in ResourceUtils, but as > >they are unreleased we could change them to > instance > >methods. The behavior there is fairly > >straightforward, though, so I'm not sure if > anything > >would be gained by this... > > > >-Matt > > > > > Whell it would mean that if we do it in FileUtils, > we wouldn't benfit > from it when Resources come into play. Futhermore, > if introduce the nio > copy under the responsibility of the ResourceUtils > all users of > FileUtils would benefit right away.
I'm afraid I've never studied nio in much detail... do its performance enhancements extend to non-file-based IO? -Matt > > Martijn > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
