On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> bin-distro [1]
> * It would be nice to have a readable version of the
> contributors.xml. Can be generated with an xsl like [2].
done.
> * Empty etc/ directory?
fixed (if it is empty, it won't end up in the distribution).
> * I would prefer a manual with an Ant-style: with a navigation on
> the left. And for screenreader maybe with div-containers, not
> frames.
The TODO list says
,----
| * make docs a little bit more accessible
`----
which can certainly involve "make them prettier". But let's become
real, there is now way that anything I did would be prettied than what
we have. Be my guest. ;-)
> * The manual has a mixture of two styles (compare csc and msbuild)
True, will be fixed before the final release.
> * no doap-file
Would we want to distribute it? I'll add one to svn.
> src-distro [3]
> * no build.xml in root directory?
oops, fixed.
> * POM: no dependency on JUnit + AntUnit for testing
This is intentional, ask Steve.
> What is with "infrastructure" of Ant core like
> - check.xml
would require some work. Does it make sense to add it to a
distribution?
> - fetch.xml
Not necessary, there is nothing to fetch.
> - patch.xml
We can expect users to have Ant around. Do we want to ship patch.xml
with every Antlib?
Thanks
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
