On Mon, 04 Sep 2006, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Vote: > > yes this is a good thing for 1.7 [ ] > > no, let us stabilize 1.7 [ X] > > > > I think right now I'm going to in the no category, though +0 rather > than -1. This is not because I dont think its a good idea -I think > it is wonderful- but I think the complications of adding it will add > lots of surprises. Most importantly, it becomes really hard to > uninvent once it has shipped.
Same here. > What we could do is take this as the opportunity to make a working > 1.8 branch and put in in there, and post 1.7.0 think about adding it > to the 1.7.x branch. Or rather create an 1.7.x branch and put the classloader into trunk. We are not required to let three years pass between 1.7.0 and 1.8.0. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
