DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40682>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40682 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-05 09:24 ------- Thanks for the test case - it was a *big* help. I have tracked down the problem. The problem is due to http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40682 (Order of addX and addConfiguredX), the order of setting attributes and elements was changed from addX setY addConfiguredZ execute() to setY addX, addConfiguredZ (in order of the build file) execute() However junittask depends on the first order. It is easy to fix JUnitTask for this, (I will apply patch when I reach my svn machine), however 1) I wonder if we need to rollback 40621 2) why does junit only work for fork="yes" for junit4? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
