Hello Paul,

Here is what you could add to your POM :

22a23,25
>     <!--
>     NetRexx is not available on ibiblio
>     -->
34a38,86
>     <dependency>
>       <groupId>org.jruby</groupId>
>       <artifactId>jruby</artifactId>
>       <version>0.8.3</version>
>       <optional>true</optional>
>       <scope>runtime</scope>
>     </dependency>
>     <dependency>
>       <groupId>org.beanshell</groupId>
>       <artifactId>bsh</artifactId>
>       <version>2.0b4</version>
>       <optional>true</optional>
>       <scope>runtime</scope>
>     </dependency>
>     <dependency>
>       <groupId>org.beanshell</groupId>
>       <artifactId>bsh-core</artifactId>
>       <version>2.0b4</version>
>       <optional>true</optional>
>       <scope>runtime</scope>
>     </dependency>
>     <dependency>
>       <groupId>jython</groupId>
>       <artifactId>jython</artifactId>
>       <version>2.1</version>
>       <optional>true</optional>
>       <scope>runtime</scope>
>     </dependency>
>     <dependency>
>       <groupId>rhino</groupId>
>       <artifactId>js</artifactId>
>       <version>1.6R3</version>
>       <optional>true</optional>
>       <scope>runtime</scope>
>     </dependency>
>     <dependency>
>       <groupId>groovy</groupId>
>       <artifactId>groovy</artifactId>
>       <version>1.0-jsr-06</version>
>       <optional>true</optional>
>       <scope>runtime</scope>
>     </dependency>
>     <dependency>
>       <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>       <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>       <version>2.7.0</version>
>       <optional>true</optional>
>       <scope>runtime</scope>
>     </dependency>

Check with the maven team or by emailing [email protected] whether
it is possible to overwrite the existing POM for 2.4.0 or whether these
additions would have to wait until the next release of bsf.

Regards,
Antoine

Paul King wrote:
> Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
>> [...] I hope that for instance the pom of commons-bsf should itself
>> contain js, groovy, and the other supported languages as optional
>> runtime dependencies. 
>
> BSF doesn't contain optional jars at the moment. The project team
> members are fairly new to Maven and didn't have a POM originally.
> I put in a request to have a minimal POM put in place but didn't
> include optional jars. I am sure they won't mind if you put in a
> request to add these to the POM. I will do so myself if I get some
> time but not in the next few days.
>
> Cheers, Paul.
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to