--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/17/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Example name for the task we've talked about
> before
> > but have not written for inclusion, the
> > counter-argument being that the correct thing to
> do
> > here would be write a custom task. But there are
> Java
> > programs (which shall remain nameless) that are
> > ridiculously complicated to call API-style due to
> the
> > fact that they are meant to be invoked by means of
> a
> > main() method, period. I can't say that I see a
> > reason we can't include such a task in the near
> > future... anyone offering a different opinion had
> best
> > speak up sooner than that. ;)
>
> How does that relate to <java> or <script>? --DD
>
Obviously <script> or <for> could be used, but you
know how it is... some orgs can't or won't accept
dependencies in their buildfiles. Once we get
somewhere with the auto-install stuff we've talked
about with Ant + Ivy, that might be easier to handle
as the user is no longer responsible for setting
everything up. A build could simply retrieve
ant-contrib on the fly.
As for how the proposed <applyjava> relates to <java>,
I imagine it would extend <java> in almost or exactly
the same way that <apply> extends <exec>.
-Matt
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________Luggage?
GPS? Comic books?
Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=graduation+gifts&cs=bz
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
