On 2008-11-21, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The concept of target-group seems confusing for the moment.
At least it confuses me, but I get the feeling that everybody must be seeing something that I don't - so I very much appreciate any effort to enlighten me. While I do see differences between targets and target-groups for people writing build files, I miss where they differ (or should differ) for anybody running Ant. > Instead of having one special type of target to define a new concept, > maybe we need 2 : target-group and target-part. > With the caracteristics that : > * target-group and target-part can both have depends to any target. > * target-part can declare that they are part of 1 or more target-group. > * target-group have no content (not sure that's require for the view > that we want). Which from the end-user POV means targets and target-groups are command line callable, target-parts are not. Is that correct? Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
