Stefan Bodewig wrote: > In general it > is enough to send the patch to one place and bugzilla is the better > option.
I'm glad to hear that, as I prefer bugzilla over mailing lists myself. You might consider updating the ant manual to reflect this policy. http://ant.apache.org/ant_task_guidelines.html currently states: > The patches should be sent as an attachment to a message titled > [PATCH] and distinctive one-line summary in the subject of the patch. > The filename/task and the change usually suffices. It's important to > include the changes as an attachment, as too many mailers reformat > the text pasted in, which breaks the patch. > > [...] > > We also like submissions to be added to bugzilla, so that they dont > get lost. Please submit them by first filing the report with a > meaningful name, then adding files as attachments. Use CVS diff files > please! If you prefer bugzilla over mails, it should be indicated here. You might also replace CVS by SVN while you are at it. Greetings, Martin von Gagern
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
