On 2011-07-17, Matt Benson wrote: > Currently each nested condition is xor'd against the cumulative result, thus:
> xor(true, false) == true > xor(true, false, true) == false > xor(true, false, true, false) == false > Is this correct? It would seem that semantically an xor over multiple > nested conditions should mean that exactly one value should evaluate > true in order for the xor operation to yield truth. While my gut feeling agrees with what you describe the documentation of the xor description actually says ,---- | It only evaluates to true if an odd number of nested conditions are true. `---- If you need the "other kind of xor" then a new container would be required. "exactlyOneOf" or something similar? Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
