Hello Jesse, in fact the patch is failing one test :
testTestMethods in junit-test.xml The test bad in T2.java runs [or at least something is reported as failing ] although only "ok" is included. Regards, Antoine <echo file="${input}/T1.java">public class T1 extends junit.framework.TestCase { public void testOK() {} public void testBad() {throw new RuntimeException("failed");} }</echo> <echo file="${input}/T2.java"> import org.junit.Test; public class T2 { @Test public void ok() {} @Test public void bad() { throw new RuntimeException("failed");} }</echo> <javac srcdir="${input}" destdir="${output}" includes="T1.java,T2.java" source="5" includeantruntime="false"> <classpath> <path refid="junit" /> </classpath> </javac> <junit fork="true" printsummary="true" haltonerror="true"> <classpath> <pathelement location="${output}" /> <path refid="junit" /> </classpath> <test name="T1" methods="testOK" /> <test name="T2" methods="ok" /> </junit> </target> Regards, Antoine On Mar 4, 2013, at 4:55 PM, Jesse Glick wrote: > -0. My main reservation is that an important patch, JUnit @Ignore support > [1], is outstanding. (I promised Michael Clarke it would get reviewed.) It > could be pushed back to 1.9.1 of course, but that could be a long way off. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43969 > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org