+1 for Ant and Ivy, +0 elsewhere. If we wanted to do a history-preserving transform (with branches, merges &c. faithfully preserved), I'd be happy to help with the configuration and use of SubGit (which, while typically a commercially-licensed tool, has zero-cost licenses available for OSS projects) for this purpose; in my experience, it results in a considerably higher-quality transform than the competing git-svn tooling. (SubGit also offers bidirectional translation support, but I'm wary of the deployment requirements of same, and have concerns as to whether making proprietary tooling a dependency of Apache's ongoing infrastructure would be acceptable or wise).
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert <anto...@gmx.de>wrote: > Hi, > > Let's vote about migrating to git : > > - Ant > > - Ivy > > - easyant > > - Ivyde > > - the antlibs > > I am not including the sandbox in the thread intentionally. > > The web sites will remain in svn in any event because svnpubsub is the > only supported mechanism to maintain web sites AFAIK. > > [] Yes > [] No > > > Let me start with my +1 > > Antoine > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org > >
