On 2014-04-29, <chris.hol...@awltux.com> wrote: > Hi Stephan: nod of appreciation for AntUnit :-),
Oh, many people have contributed. > Is the code base quiet because there are no further changes required, > or is there an alternative that I should use instead? Probably because it does what is needed by Ant itself and the antlibs that use AntUnit. There is one other issue raised against AntUnit that I wanted to look into anyway, but in general it is silent because nobody has an itch to scratch. > Being able to dump the logs is very handy when debugging the > tests/build scripts :-) ACK > If the LogCapturer was only intended to be used to assert against the > logs, the EOL shouldn't interfere with existing functionality (unless > the assert is checking for multi line log entries; which I suspect is > the exception to the rule). We can always try what happens to the Ant and Antlib builds. If I commit your patch then Gump will pick it up and use it - I don't expect there to be many other AntUnit users. Maybe we can introduce an option, though, I'l look into it soonish. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
