Maarten, Jan right now this only has my implicit vote. Would you be more inclined to vote if the date was included inside the changelog? If so, I'll re-roll the release.
Stefan On 2017-05-31, Maarten Coene wrote: > Why not simply <release version="1.5" date="2017-05-30"> ?That is the date > the vote started and the binaries were built?Or perhaps you could add a few > days to it and make sure the vote ends at that date? > It's just strange when reading the documentation of a released version to see > that it's 'unreleased' or 'during-release'... > Maarten > Van: "Matèrne, Jan (RZF, Ref 410)" <jan.mate...@fv.nrw.de> > Aan: Ant Developers List <dev@ant.apache.org> > Verzonden: woensdag 31 mei 10:25 2017 > Onderwerp: AW: [VOTE] Release Compress Antlib 1.5 based on RC1 > Maybe > <release version="1.5" date="during-release" vote-starts="2017-05-30">? > Jan > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 31. Mai 2017 09:46 > An: dev@ant.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Compress Antlib 1.5 based on RC1 > On 2017-05-31, Maarten Coene wrote: >> The changes.xml still contains the following line:<release version="1.5" >> date="unreleased"> >> I'm not sure this should block the release, but I think it would be better >> to fill in the correct date. > This is a chicken and egg problem. As long as the vote hasn't passed, I > don't know the release date :-) > Stefan > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
