I have no personal preference for this specific kind of usages. Although
I almost always use Map.Entry in the statements, I don't mind seeing
code which uses just plain Entry. Having said that, for this specific
kind of cases, I personally would just let the developer decide which
form of it to use instead of trying to make it consistent via checkstyle
or refactoring.
-Jaikiran
On 18/07/17 5:09 PM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
In my last PR I tried to address inconsistencies with import of nested
classes, such as Map.Entry; some classes, e.g. IvySettings ended up with
foreach loops over both Entry and Map.Entry. So: should qualified names be
encouraged or avoided?
Gintas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
