On 10/04/18 12:27 AM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
2018-04-08 16:13 GMT+00:00 Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org>:
I don't believe woking well tested code rots. Code rot is something that
happends when code doesn't get adapted to changing environments or
requirements. This is not the case here.
I wrote earlier that I was about to review the unit tests.
I was particularly unhappy about the root-property hack for an ancient
deficiency in Surefire.
I checked some of the mail discussions, but couldn't find any relevant
details about this. Can you explain what the root-property hack is? I
also don't understand how Surefire is related to our tests, which are
run using the junit and ant-unit framework. If I missed some previous
discussion, please pointme to it and I'll read up on that.
I consider my previous commits a sort of a groundwork for refactorisation
of JUnit tests.
Considering the commits that have been made (even just considering only
the Ant ones), I don't see how those relate to some plan to refactor
JUnit tests.
-Jaikiran
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
