On 2018-06-05, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > Stefan is right -- "followsymlinks" for the fileset should have been called > "skipsymlinks" or something like that.
I'm afraid I don't follow you here, what did you expect followsymlinks going by the name? What would the "new semantics of followsymlinks" you talk about be? How would the combinations followsymlinks="true" skipsymlinks="true" followsymlinks="false" skipsymlinks="false" behave? Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
