On 20 March 2013 19:30, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > On 19/03/13 20:29, Peter Ansell wrote: >>> >>> 6. /site - our beloved Any23 site. It is essential that we keep some >>> > aspect of this writable, however I would like to suggest that we >>> > keep this >>> > in SVN like trafficserver does [4] >> >> Git negative >> Svn positive : Easiest way to publish website from what I can tell. >> > > I think currently svnpubsub is exactly that - svn. > > For Marmotta, we have to have svn for the website - everything else is and > was from day 1, git.
For me Any23 has been Git from day one (except for those pesky patches) and it has worked for me so far! Cheers, Peter
