Hi All, The PR is open and we have added the copyrights in both the top level LICENSE file as well as the source code file: https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/631/files#diff-de2f6f7859b7615406a67b287fe86d3e
Here are the copyrights in the original projects: https://github.com/sangupta/bloomfilter/blob/master/COPYRIGHT.txt https://github.com/sangupta/murmur/blob/master/COPYRIGHT.txt PR: https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/631 Will merge this in a couple of days, if there are no other comments. Thanks. ~ Bhupesh _______________________________________________________ Bhupesh Chawda E: bhup...@datatorrent.com | Twitter: @bhupeshsc www.datatorrent.com | apex.apache.org On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Pramod Immaneni <pra...@datatorrent.com> wrote: > Hi, > > The PR 521 <https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/521> for > APEXMALHAR-2366, <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2366> > uses a modified version of a utility class available in hadoop, here > <https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/trunk/hadoop-common- > project/hadoop-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/ > util/bloom/BloomFilter.java>. > This utility carries two licences, one a regular one from ASF and a second > one from European Commission (EC). Both are listed in the source and the EC > one is listed in the hadoop project LICENSE file as well, here > <https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/trunk/LICENSE.txt>. > > Before you ask, I see that there were discussions on the PR on looking for > suitable alternatives and this was still the outcome. I was not a party to > those discussions and just helping bring it to a conclusion as the original > author is no longer engaged with it. > > I think it should be safe to include it following the same model hadoop is > following in including the license in the source code and the project > LICENSE file. I wanted to get the feedback from the community as well. > > Thanks >
