+1 for option 1 -1 for option 2 as I see no impending need to do this now, as in if we don't do this, things will fall apart. It will be a source of more disruption and confusion. Malhar has been around for quite some time, evolving and growing during this period and going to version 4.0 would be a natural progression. Since this is a major version change, there is more of a license to relegate things that are deemed unsuitable for production use to contrib (an area designated for that purpose), remove deprecated items, move things around and possibly even make backwards incompatible functionality changes so I don't see a need to change the artifact id and identity of the project.
Thanks On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Munagala Ramanath < amberar...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > +1 for option 2 (primary) > +1 for option 1 (secondary) > Ram > > > On Tuesday, August 22, 2017, 6:58:46 AM PDT, Vlad Rozov <vro...@apache.org> > wrote: > > +1 for option 2 (primary) > +1 for option 1 (secondary) > > Thank you, > > Vlad > > On 8/21/17 23:37, Ananth G wrote: > > +1 for option 2 and second vote for option 1 > > > > Have we finalized the library name ? Going from Apex-malhar 3.7 to > Apex-malhar-1.0 would be counter intuitive. Also it would be great if we > have an agreed process to mark an operator from @evolving to stable version > given we are trying to address this as well as part of the proposal > > > > Regards > > Ananth > > > >> On 22 Aug 2017, at 11:40 am, Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> +1 for option 2 (second vote +1 for option 1) > >> > >> > >>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> This is to formalize the major version change for Malhar discussed in > [1]. > >>> > >>> There are two options for major version change. Major version change > will > >>> rename legacy packages to org.apache.apex sub packages while retaining > file > >>> history in git. Other cleanup such as removing deprecated code is also > >>> expected. > >>> > >>> 1. Version 4.0 as major version change from 3.x > >>> > >>> 2. Version 1.0 with simultaneous change of Maven artifact IDs > >>> > >>> Please refer to the discussion thread [1] for reasoning behind both of > the > >>> options. > >>> > >>> Please vote on both options. Primary vote for your preferred option, > >>> secondary for the other. Secondary vote can be used when counting > primary > >>> vote alone isn't conclusive. > >>> > >>> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Thomas > >>> > >>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ > bd1db8a2d01e23b0c0ab98a785f6ee > >>> 9492a1ac9e52d422568a46e5f3@%3Cdev.apex.apache.org%3E > >>> > > > Thank you, > > Vlad >
