I'm +1 on option 2, second +1 on option 1. Having two names, in our case Apex and Malhar, in a project tend to confuse people, especially since the prefix "mal" usually has a negative connotation in English.
David On Aug 23, 2017 3:17 PM, "Sergey Golovko" <ser...@datatorrent.com> wrote: > -1 for the option 2 > > I don't think it makes sense to rush to rename the package name. There are > Apache Java projects that use the original package names after migration to > Apache Software Foundation. For instance, > > Apache Felix <https://projects.apache.org/project.html?felix> (org.osgi) > Apache Groovy <https://projects.apache.org/project.html?groovy> (groovy) > > Personally I don't like the idea to rename package names for any existing > tools and applications. It can just be a big confusion for users without > any real benefits. > > -1 for the option 1 > > I see only one valid reason to change the major version now. It is the full > refactoring of the code without supporting of any backward compatibility. > If we are going to make the package refactoring we need to change the major > version. If we are not going to do it now, it does not make sense to > change the major version. I don't think it makes sense to vote for the two > options separately. > > Thanks, > Sergey > > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote: > > > So far everyone else has voted +1 on option 1. Your -1 is not a veto > > (unlike your previous -1 on a pull request), but your response also > states > > "I am for option 1" and that you want to have the branch release-3 > > included. So why don't you include that into your vote for option 1 as a > > condition, since that's what is going to happen anyways. > > > > Thomas > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Amol Kekre <a...@datatorrent.com> > wrote: > > > > > On just voting part, I remain -1 on both options > > > > > > Thks > > > Amol > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Amol Kekre <a...@datatorrent.com> > wrote: > > > > > I am -1 on option 2. There is no need to do so, as going back on > versions > > > at this stage has consequences to Apex users. > > > > > > I am for option 1, but I want to propose explicit change to the text. > > Based > > > on verbatim text, I am voting -1 on option 1. I believe in the original > > > discussion thread there was talk about continuing release-3 that should > > be > > > explicit in the vote. > > > > > > > > >
