+1 to all of this

There are existing JIRAs that you can assign / add to:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-727

Thanks!



On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 4:26 AM, Chinmay Kolhatkar <chin...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Hello Community,
>
> I want to propose following improvements for apex-core build and related
> steps:
>
> 1. Most (probably all of the open source project) has the a binary release
> package of the software and not just the source release package. Currently
> we have only source package. Luckily there are few places (outside of
> apache apex) where binary packages of apex has been created for different
> purposes : https://github.com/atrato/apex-cli-package &
> https://github.com/apache/bigtop)
>
> Proposal here is generate this binary release package as a part of build
> process of apex-core.
>
>
> 2. Currently, the docker build that is being created for apex is built one
> of my personal repository (https://github.com/chinmaykolhatkar/docker-pool
> ).
> While I don't mind hosting the content (Dockerfile etc...) in my
> repository, I believe it make sense to host this in apex-core repository.
> This way, there is a possibility of using docker github triggers for
> building the docker image from release branches.
>
>
> 3. Currently the docker build uses hadoop and apex specific packages from
> bigtop deb repo & CI. (See
> https://github.com/chinmaykolhatkar/docker-pool/
> blob/master/apex/ubuntu/app/setup.sh
> for more details)
> While use of hadoop packages from bigtop repo is fine, we also need to rely
> on bigtop contribution to update apex component and then build from bigtop
> CI for getting apex.deb package. Basically our docker image generation
> process gets blocked on bigtop source update to generate the updated apex
> deb.
> As we technically don't need to depend on bigtop to generate the apex
> binary, the proposal here is to generate binary package during build
> process (point 1) and use that during docker image build process instead of
> using the ready made deb package from bigtop CI.
>
>
> I understand that there are multiple items being mention in a single mail
> but they seem related hence the mail.
>
> Please let me know your opinion on above items.
>
> Thanks,
> Chinmay.
>

Reply via email to