Concluding this discussion. There are 4 votes for WindowDataLogger and 3
for WindowDataManager. Will call it WindowDataLogger.

The ticket is created here:
https://malhar.atlassian.net/browse/MLHR-1902

Thanks,
Chandni


On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Siyuan Hua <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 for 1
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:30 AM, David Yan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1 for 1
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Chandni Singh <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Currently going by Java code, the IdempotentStorageManager extends
> > > StorageAgent which is why WindowStorageAgent came up.
> > > It does delete data till window that gets committed.
> > >
> > >
> > > These are some options which I have came across.
> > >
> > > 1. WindowDataLogger
> > > 2. WindowStorageAgent
> > > 3. WindowDataManager
> > >
> > > My vote is for option 1 "WindowDataLogger".
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Chandni
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Pramod Immaneni <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > It would still to manage the log isn't it, like clearing out data
> > > > corresponding to committed windows.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Thomas Weise <
> [email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The underlying abstraction is a log. Why shouldn't the name reflect
> > > that?
> > > > > Or is there anything added that makes it a "manager" or "agent"?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Chandni Singh <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > WindowStorageAgent was another suggestion as
> > IdempotentStorageManager
> > > > > > extends StorageAgent.
> > > > > > If no one has any objection will call it that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Chandni
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Chandni Singh <
> > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > @Sandeep Will deprecate old IdempotentStorageManager. This will
> > be
> > > a
> > > > > copy
> > > > > > > of the old one with a different name.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > @Sandesh
> > > > > > > A data store, in my opinion, is an entity which store data.
> This
> > > > > doesn't
> > > > > > > store data. It is used to save state per window.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > @Pramod
> > > > > > > Do you like WindowStateLogger?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Chandni
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Nov 15, 2015 6:59 PM, "Sandeep Deshmukh" <
> > > [email protected]
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Will there be any issue in semantic versioning because of this
> > > > change?
> > > > > > >> On 16 Nov 2015 07:35, "Sandesh Hegde" <
> [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > As it is used to store & retrieve data, just call it
> > DataStore.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 3:40 PM Pramod Immaneni <
> > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > > Since this is mainly for storing information pertaining to
> > > data
> > > > or
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > >> > data
> > > > > > >> > > itself how about WindowDataManager or something like that.
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Chandni Singh <
> > > > > > >> [email protected]>
> > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > Received feedback from couple of folks that
> > > > > > >> IdempotentStorageManager is
> > > > > > >> > > not
> > > > > > >> > > > a good name for that component. It is used in some of
> our
> > > > > > >> input/output
> > > > > > >> > > > operator for saving per window data.
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > I was thinking of calling it WindowLogger.
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > Let me know if anyone has a better suggestion.
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > Chandni
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to